You are viewing the site in preview mode

Skip to main content

Table 7 Correct classification rates for extreme unbalanced designs

From: Trend tests for the evaluation of exposure-response relationships in epidemiological exposure studies

Sample sizes N Alternative Power Correct classif. rate
200/200/200/200 800 .05/.05/.05/.10 .682 .935
540/200/40/20 800 .05/.05/.05/.10 .251 .758
200/200/200/200 800 .05/.05/.10/.10 .792 .831
540/200/40/20 800 .05/.05/.10/.10 .425 .687
200/200/200/200 800 .05/.10/.10/.10 .603 .783
540/200/40/20 800 .05/.10/.10/.10 .755 .854
400/400/400/400 1600 .05/.05/.05/.10 .915 .971
1340/200/40/20 1600 .05/.05/.05/.10 .266 .749
400/400/400/400 1600 .05/.05/.10/.10 .968 .916
1340/200/40/20 1600 .05/.05/.10/.10 .438 .667
400/400/400/400 1600 .05/.10/.10/.10 .903 .904
1340/200/40/20 1600 .05/.10/.10/.10 .832 .883
9740/200/40/20 10000 .05/.05/.05/.10 .252 .702